Which of the following is an outcome of having a non-disturbance clause in a lease?

A non-disturbance clause is an important provision included in leases, particularly in commercial real estate, that helps to protect tenants' rights in the event of changes in property ownership or other disruptions. When a non-disturbance clause is included in a lease agreement, it ensures that the tenant can continue to occupy the property and enjoy the benefits of the lease even if the property is sold or the owner changes. This creates a sense of security for the tenant, knowing that their tenancy will not be interrupted despite ownership changes. It essentially safeguards the tenant's business operations and investment in the leased space.

Thus, the outcome of stronger tenant security during ownership changes is a key purpose of a non-disturbance clause. It fosters a stable business environment because tenants can plan long-term knowing their rights are protected, even in the face of changes that may affect the property’s management.

The other options do not capture the essence of what a non-disturbance clause entails. Increased rental prices do not directly relate to the clause itself, as the clause addresses security of tenancy rather than pricing. Less responsibility for property maintenance is not accurate either, as the lease agreement will still dictate the maintenance responsibilities regardless of the ownership status. Finally, immediate termination of the lease upon sale